Saturday, October 9 in Florence organized groups and movements of citizens held a demonstration in Piazza SS. Annunziata.
Citizens for Trees intervene personally in the event for several reasons.
First of all because they have always publicly stated that it considers the works for the infrastructure as incompatible with the protection of the urban environment and natural and to be approved despite being in clear breach of current law to protect both national and European laws regarding procurement and the way that the sacrosanct principles of precaution, that the preservation of public natural heritage and historical monuments. So
Citizens for Trees can not fail to adhere to the dissent and protest;
does not officially participate in many circumstances because they had to acknowledge that the promoters of dissent and protest, at least some of them have never expressed its support for some initiatives of its own motion, dropping specific requests for support.
This refers in particular to support the fear of an even more pronounced in respect of provincial and regional municipal governments, almost as if to leave is always open and a viable corridor deal: In some cases this should be done, but in others, when the 'primary goal is to spread AND ORGANIZATION popular dissent, the opposition must be BE in our view very clearly stated.
Citizens for Trees has covered every possible avenue with such clarity in the law, because what you ask
E 'compliance with the law' IS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAND MANAGEMENT. From
exposed to the Judiciary, to requests for intervention by the responsible persons to land, water, landmarks, Citizens for the Trees has raised only ZERO ANSWERS: therefore the sense that our movement has given these facts is that in this country not THERE 'NO ONE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC AND COMMON INTEREST AND NON C'E' ANYONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE 'to enforce existing laws.
Citizens for Trees has released their studies and will be processed through its site that is sending them and making them available to anyone who wished to use them: on the findings as proof that the destruction of the Viale Morgagni and the site of the former slaughterhouse are environmental insults and National Historical Heritage (the subject of complaints to the judiciary and local bodies of the Ministry of BC),
to requests to municipal entities are responsible to publicly expose the documentation, that the Act also requires, on the reports of environmental accidents which should precede the works underway, or planned, or unfortunately have already taken Castle, an area that falls under the provisions of protection of regional, national and European strategic interests as defined environmental and natural.
course, high-speed rail infrastructure were considered by the Citizens for the Trees as fatal to the City of Florence and the water balance, balance is not a slogan, but a prerequisite for the safety of buildings, citizens, monuments, this position has always been made public in debates, either through written submissions and made available for anyone to use it.
But the finding of interest was once again very disappointing and when called for collaboration with other formations, and when we felt that our positions were responding "political" and one should not "do politics".
policy of the politicians and opportunists from us has never been practiced, it is well understood, but it is also only right to say that when people are concerned about the management of public POLITICS AND MAKE THIS 'RIGHT / constitutional duty, essence of democracy.
Or this is an area reserved for only a few?
Just to clarify again, it would be nice for someone to answer on a question of conflict of interest arising during these years, right here in Florence, precisely in the tangles of Chinese boxes that the Tramway and TGV bring with them, as well as elsewhere and at higher locations:
AND 'KNOW YOUR INTEREST AND PERSONNEL MONTEZEMOLO VALLEY HAVE HIGH SPEED TRAINS' (Alstom / Bombardier , Montezemolo, Della Valle ...).
THE ROLE THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE A PUBLIC LOCAL OR NATIONAL LEVEL, THE PROMOTERS INVESTORS AND BE VERY IMPORTANT IN THE PROVISION AND MANAGEMENT AV, IS NOT INTENDED AS A GREAT AND FURTHER CONFLICT OF INTEREST IF MONTEZEMOLO CANDIDATE WERE TO BECOME PRESIDENT AND COUNCIL ?
As just one example, what if you think around?
Is everything okay? RIDGE ALSO THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR of the AV HAVE A CONTRACT WORKS coopsette (which is part Consorzio Etruria) / NODAVIA?
He's talking about, or not?
course is old news by now, moldy, but does not appear that he ever talked too much
TO NO TAV NO HIGH SPEED 'AND INTEREST (hidden or obvious) who's behind it! !
are always the same that goes round and round, were among those who wanted Tramway (Alstom / Bombardier, Consorzio Etruria, Baldassini & C, etc).
They cut trees, required yards, polluted and everything else, nothing to solve the traffic and commuting, and now dig into the ground and cut the natural flow of water in the subsoil of Florence.
protests, demonstrations, but at least we are credible!
0 comments:
Post a Comment